Ideation and Methodology
Our approach to this study sat at a programmatic level and began with a landscape mapping of digital skilling programs across India, with emphasis on analysing a program’s strategy, curriculum, pedagogical approaches, and implementation strategies. This allowed the team to focus on the embeddedness of gender biases within the existing program design and delivery.
Gender analysis is a critical tool to uncover the differential access and barriers determined by one’s gender identity. A gender audit, on the other hand, provides a method that focuses on highlighting patterns across gaps and strengths at an organisational level (such as structures, composition, culture, and management of human resources, and design and delivery of policies). We decided early in the process that we would use gender auditing to understand programmatic insights across organisational structure and pedagogy (content and curriculum).
The selection of digital skilling programs required a rigorous shortlisting of active programs with regional, linguistic, and thematic relevance in the Indian context. To ensure a gender-sensitive evaluation of the programs, a gender analysis framework was developed and utilised as a guiding checklist to identify effective and contextually relevant approaches for rural women. Given the vast disconnect between program design and communities’ needs, we wanted to bridge this gap by designing with communities rather than for them, ensuring that programs were locally relevant and able to secure approval from stakeholders. Ultimately, we narrowed our collaboration with grassroots partners like the Manjari Foundation, Digital Green and Jagriti Enterprise Centre Purvanchal to ground our study.